<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Chess Teaching</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chessteacher.110mb.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chessteacher.110mb.com</link>
	<description>Chess Lessons &#38; Exercises</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 16:32:12 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Finding combinations by THOMAS</title>
		<link>http://chessteacher.110mb.com/2008/03/26/finding-combinations/comment-page-1/#comment-8614</link>
		<dc:creator>THOMAS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 16:32:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chessteacher.110mb.com/2008/03/26/finding-combinations/#comment-8614</guid>
		<description>Of course I concur.Excellent Website.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course I concur.Excellent Website.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Finding combinations by THOMAS</title>
		<link>http://chessteacher.110mb.com/2008/03/26/finding-combinations/comment-page-1/#comment-8613</link>
		<dc:creator>THOMAS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 16:28:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chessteacher.110mb.com/2008/03/26/finding-combinations/#comment-8613</guid>
		<description>I concur.Excellent website dude.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I concur.Excellent website dude.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Finding combinations by Chess Teacher</title>
		<link>http://chessteacher.110mb.com/2008/03/26/finding-combinations/comment-page-1/#comment-8611</link>
		<dc:creator>Chess Teacher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 10:29:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chessteacher.110mb.com/2008/03/26/finding-combinations/#comment-8611</guid>
		<description>@THOMAS
White has support from the c4 knight, but please keep in mind that Black is only allowed to do one move at the time.  Please note that f7 can be defended by playing ...Be6. 
The mentioned move 12.Nf7+ is possible because the king has moved (and had to move after 9.Qxd8+) 9...Kxd8.   Now after 10.Nxe5 the move 10...Be6 doesn&#039;t help anymore, because of 11.Bxe6 fxe6 12.Nf7+</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@THOMAS<br />
White has support from the c4 knight, but please keep in mind that Black is only allowed to do one move at the time.  Please note that f7 can be defended by playing &#8230;Be6.<br />
The mentioned move 12.Nf7+ is possible because the king has moved (and had to move after 9.Qxd8+) 9&#8230;Kxd8.   Now after 10.Nxe5 the move 10&#8230;Be6 doesn&#8217;t help anymore, because of 11.Bxe6 fxe6 12.Nf7+</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Finding combinations by THOMAS</title>
		<link>http://chessteacher.110mb.com/2008/03/26/finding-combinations/comment-page-1/#comment-8600</link>
		<dc:creator>THOMAS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 17:28:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chessteacher.110mb.com/2008/03/26/finding-combinations/#comment-8600</guid>
		<description>Whats preventing the knight fork 10.Nxf7 when white has support from the c4 knight? Also how is 12.Nf7+ possible when the king never moved?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whats preventing the knight fork 10.Nxf7 when white has support from the c4 knight? Also how is 12.Nf7+ possible when the king never moved?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bird &#8211; Steinitz (1866) by Chess Teacher</title>
		<link>http://chessteacher.110mb.com/2009/11/15/bird-steinitz-1866/comment-page-1/#comment-8579</link>
		<dc:creator>Chess Teacher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 16:02:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chessteacher.110mb.com/?p=355#comment-8579</guid>
		<description>@Mark
Because after 66...b5+ 67.Kxb5 it is clear that the other pawn can not be stopped; 67...a3 68.Ka4 a2 69.Kb3 a1=Q
Bird tries to prevent the promotion of the pawn.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Mark<br />
Because after 66&#8230;b5+ 67.Kxb5 it is clear that the other pawn can not be stopped; 67&#8230;a3 68.Ka4 a2 69.Kb3 a1=Q<br />
Bird tries to prevent the promotion of the pawn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bird &#8211; Steinitz (1866) by Mark Spring</title>
		<link>http://chessteacher.110mb.com/2009/11/15/bird-steinitz-1866/comment-page-1/#comment-8578</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Spring</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 10:38:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chessteacher.110mb.com/?p=355#comment-8578</guid>
		<description>Why didn&#039;t Bird react with 67.Kb5x and take the black pawn?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why didn&#8217;t Bird react with 67.Kb5x and take the black pawn?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on WordPress 2.7.1 by eliskan</title>
		<link>http://chessteacher.110mb.com/2009/02/11/wordpress-271/comment-page-1/#comment-8574</link>
		<dc:creator>eliskan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 21:52:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chessteacher.110mb.com/?p=326#comment-8574</guid>
		<description>Some of those sacrifices are pretty intense, overall this was an interesting game.  It was funny, for a moment almost all the black pieces were on the dark squares hiding from the other guys bishop while he did the same, hiding on the lighter squares from the light bishop!

Funny match.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some of those sacrifices are pretty intense, overall this was an interesting game.  It was funny, for a moment almost all the black pieces were on the dark squares hiding from the other guys bishop while he did the same, hiding on the lighter squares from the light bishop!</p>
<p>Funny match.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Fried Liver Attack by Chess Teacher</title>
		<link>http://chessteacher.110mb.com/2007/10/21/fried-liver-attack/comment-page-1/#comment-8560</link>
		<dc:creator>Chess Teacher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 14:31:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chessteacher.110mb.com/2007/10/21/fried-liver-attack/#comment-8560</guid>
		<description>After 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Nf6 4.Ng5 the move 4...Qe7 loses a pawn for black as you said but also results in a dubious position  5.Bxf7+ Kd8

The move 4...d5 is certainly bettter, but if you don&#039;t like this move you may consider the interesting alternative 4...Bc5 5.Bxf7+ Ke7 6.Bd5 Rf8 7.O-O d6 
Black still loses the pawn, but has some compensation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Nf6 4.Ng5 the move 4&#8230;Qe7 loses a pawn for black as you said but also results in a dubious position  5.Bxf7+ Kd8</p>
<p>The move 4&#8230;d5 is certainly bettter, but if you don&#8217;t like this move you may consider the interesting alternative 4&#8230;Bc5 5.Bxf7+ Ke7 6.Bd5 Rf8 7.O-O d6<br />
Black still loses the pawn, but has some compensation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Fried Liver Attack by Dov</title>
		<link>http://chessteacher.110mb.com/2007/10/21/fried-liver-attack/comment-page-1/#comment-8554</link>
		<dc:creator>Dov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 08:34:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chessteacher.110mb.com/2007/10/21/fried-liver-attack/#comment-8554</guid>
		<description>What about 4...Qe7 loses a pawn for black but is Black&#039;s King better or worse than moving towards middle of the board?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about 4&#8230;Qe7 loses a pawn for black but is Black&#8217;s King better or worse than moving towards middle of the board?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on ChessX 0.6 by Chess</title>
		<link>http://chessteacher.110mb.com/2009/10/18/chessx-0-6/comment-page-1/#comment-8546</link>
		<dc:creator>Chess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 09:14:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chessteacher.110mb.com/?p=351#comment-8546</guid>
		<description>Whew! finally I&#039;ve found this chess lesson blogs. thanks for sharing new version of ChessX version 0.6 and hope we could exchange more ideas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whew! finally I&#8217;ve found this chess lesson blogs. thanks for sharing new version of ChessX version 0.6 and hope we could exchange more ideas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
